Page views
8
7d
▼ 43% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
2.47 s
75% good · 8 samples
▲ 43% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
202 ms
67% good · 3 samples
▼ 52% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.07
88% good · 8 samples
▲ 5159% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.72 s
75% good · 8 samples
▲ 2% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
894 ms
63% good · 8 samples
▼ 12% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
63%
13% unhappy · 8 rated
13% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 8 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 48 | 1.84 s | 282 ms | 0.01 |
| Desktop | 22 | 2.01 s | 105 ms | 0.02 |
| Tablet | 8 | 2.47 s | 202 ms | 0.07 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 6 | 2.17 | 22.4 s | 49% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 0.00 | 9.8 s | 99% |
| Poor | 1 | 1.00 | 10.3 s | 66% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.00 | 0.07 | ▲ 5159% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 32 ms | 118 ms | ▲ 269% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 34 ms | 95 ms | ▲ 181% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 247 ms | 570 ms | ▲ 130% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 469 ms | 832 ms | ▲ 78% |
| p75 HTML download | 73 ms | 120 ms | ▲ 65% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 127 ms | 61 ms | ▼ 52% |
| p75 INP | 425 ms | 202 ms | ▼ 52% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 106 ms | 50 ms | ▼ 52% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 191 ms | 91 ms | ▼ 52% |
| Avg engaged time | 39.3 s | 19.3 s | ▼ 51% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 509 ms | 263 ms | ▼ 48% |