Page views
2
24h
± 0% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.53 s
100% good · 2 samples
▲ 47% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
529 ms
0% good · 1 samples
▲ 1869% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.11
50% good · 2 samples
▼ 59% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.51 s
50% good · 2 samples
▲ 96% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
860 ms
50% good · 2 samples
▲ 114% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
50%
50% unhappy · 2 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 2 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 5 | 2.12 s | 268 ms | 0.08 |
| Desktop | 3 | 2.50 s | 174 ms | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 2 | 1.53 s | 529 ms | 0.11 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 0.50 | 52.5 s | 45% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 INP · Presentation | 8 ms | 159 ms | ▲ 1869% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 12 ms | 238 ms | ▲ 1869% |
| p75 INP | 27 ms | 529 ms | ▲ 1869% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 7 ms | 132 ms | ▲ 1869% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 222 ms | 667 ms | ▲ 200% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 315 ms | 860 ms | ▲ 173% |
| p75 TTFB | 401 ms | 860 ms | ▲ 114% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 45 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 41 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 FCP | 767 ms | 1.51 s | ▲ 96% |
| p75 CLS | 0.26 | 0.11 | ▼ 59% |
| p75 LCP | 1.04 s | 1.53 s | ▲ 47% |