Page views
5
7d
▼ 44% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.64 s
80% good · 5 samples
▼ 7% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
170 ms
67% good · 3 samples
▼ 32% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
100% good · 5 samples
FCP · p75
714 ms
80% good · 5 samples
▼ 35% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
424 ms
80% good · 5 samples
▼ 25% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
60%
0% unhappy · 5 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 5 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 26 | 1.86 s | 208 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 14 | 1.81 s | 229 ms | 0.07 |
| Tablet | 5 | 1.64 s | 170 ms | 0.04 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 4 | 1.00 | 40.0 s | 66% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 0.00 | 12.1 s | 19% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 2.05 s | 338 ms | ▼ 83% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 195 ms | 57 ms | ▼ 71% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 71 ms | 28 ms | ▼ 61% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 75 ms | 36 ms | ▼ 52% |
| p75 FCP | 1.09 s | 714 ms | ▼ 35% |
| p75 INP | 252 ms | 170 ms | ▼ 32% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 63 ms | 43 ms | ▼ 32% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 113 ms | 77 ms | ▼ 32% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 76 ms | 51 ms | ▼ 32% |
| p75 TTFB | 564 ms | 424 ms | ▼ 25% |
| Avg engaged time | 44.9 s | 34.4 s | ▼ 23% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 427 ms | 342 ms | ▼ 20% |