Page views
7
7d
▼ 22% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
2.32 s
71% good · 7 samples
▼ 14% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
108 ms
100% good · 4 samples
▼ 32% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
86% good · 7 samples
FCP · p75
1.85 s
71% good · 7 samples
▼ 31% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
1.05 s
43% good · 7 samples
▼ 5% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
57%
0% unhappy · 7 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 7 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 36 | 2.19 s | 314 ms | 0.04 |
| Desktop | 30 | 1.17 s | 145 ms | 0.01 |
| Tablet | 7 | 2.32 s | 108 ms | 0.02 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 5 | 1.80 | 10.4 s | 73% |
| Needs improvement | 2 | 1.50 | 2.3 s | 34% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 149 ms | 44 ms | ▼ 70% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 147 ms | 55 ms | ▼ 63% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 524 ms | 237 ms | ▼ 55% |
| Avg engaged time | 14.2 s | 8.1 s | ▼ 43% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 1.02 s | 676 ms | ▼ 34% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 72 ms | 49 ms | ▼ 32% |
| p75 INP | 159 ms | 108 ms | ▼ 32% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 40 ms | 27 ms | ▼ 32% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 48 ms | 32 ms | ▼ 32% |
| p75 FCP | 2.69 s | 1.85 s | ▼ 31% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 486 ms | 572 ms | ▲ 18% |
| Avg scroll depth | 53% | 62% | ▲ 17% |