Page views
3
7d
▼ 62% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
2.13 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 47% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
141 ms
67% good · 3 samples
▼ 58% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.07
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 141% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.20 s
100% good · 3 samples
▲ 24% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
600 ms
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 30% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
0%
0% unhappy · 3 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 30 | 1.96 s | 155 ms | 0.01 |
| Desktop | 27 | 1.57 s | 139 ms | 0.03 |
| Tablet | 3 | 2.13 s | 141 ms | 0.07 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 1.00 | 63.1 s | 21% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 0.00 | 52.4 s | 41% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 64 ms | 470 ms | ▲ 630% |
| p75 CLS | 0.03 | 0.07 | ▲ 141% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 513 ms | 1.21 s | ▲ 135% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 150 ms | 63 ms | ▼ 58% |
| p75 INP | 333 ms | 141 ms | ▼ 58% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 83 ms | 35 ms | ▼ 58% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 100 ms | 42 ms | ▼ 58% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 56 ms | 24 ms | ▼ 57% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 45 ms | 21 ms | ▼ 54% |
| Avg engaged time | 39.5 s | 59.5 s | ▲ 51% |
| p75 LCP | 1.45 s | 2.13 s | ▲ 47% |
| Avg scroll depth | 49% | 28% | ▼ 43% |