Page views
10
7d
▲ 11% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.55 s
100% good · 10 samples
▼ 17% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
493 ms
33% good · 6 samples
▲ 111% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
90% good · 10 samples
▼ 30% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.42 s
100% good · 10 samples
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
788 ms
70% good · 10 samples
▲ 11% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
50%
20% unhappy · 10 rated
What to fix first
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
#onetrust-accept-btn-handler
p75 INP is 530 ms over 3 page views, mostly on /articles/13/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
Based on 10 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 29 | 2.40 s | 360 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 22 | 1.58 s | 81 ms | 0.02 |
| Tablet | 10 | 1.55 s | 493 ms | 0.04 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 10 | 1.60 | 40.3 s | 53% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 INP | 233 ms | 493 ms | ▲ 111% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 58 ms | 123 ms | ▲ 111% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 70 ms | 148 ms | ▲ 111% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 105 ms | 222 ms | ▲ 111% |
| Avg engaged time | 27.4 s | 40.3 s | ▲ 47% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 477 ms | 639 ms | ▲ 34% |
| p75 CLS | 0.06 | 0.04 | ▼ 30% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 477 ms | 596 ms | ▲ 25% |
| p75 LCP | 1.86 s | 1.55 s | ▼ 17% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 67 ms | 78 ms | ▲ 16% |
| Avg scroll depth | 46% | 53% | ▲ 16% |
| p75 HTML download | 117 ms | 104 ms | ▼ 11% |