Page views
5
7d
▼ 38% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.85 s
100% good · 5 samples
▼ 29% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
678 ms
25% good · 4 samples
▲ 372% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.03
80% good · 5 samples
▲ 908% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.82 s
60% good · 5 samples
▼ 10% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
849 ms
60% good · 5 samples
▼ 29% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
40%
40% unhappy · 5 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 5 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 24 | 2.51 s | 177 ms | 0.07 |
| Mobile | 14 | 2.63 s | 256 ms | 0.05 |
| Tablet | 5 | 1.85 s | 678 ms | 0.03 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 5 | 2.80 | 73.5 s | 64% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.00 | 0.03 | ▲ 908% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 65 ms | 305 ms | ▲ 372% |
| p75 INP | 144 ms | 678 ms | ▲ 372% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 36 ms | 170 ms | ▲ 372% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 43 ms | 203 ms | ▲ 372% |
| Avg engaged time | 23.2 s | 73.5 s | ▲ 217% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 347 ms | 750 ms | ▲ 116% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 56 ms | 18 ms | ▼ 68% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 139 ms | 220 ms | ▲ 58% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 63 ms | 29 ms | ▼ 54% |
| p75 LCP | 2.60 s | 1.85 s | ▼ 29% |
| p75 TTFB | 1.20 s | 849 ms | ▼ 29% |