Page views
7
7d
▲ 75% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.82 s
86% good · 7 samples
▼ 10% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
66 ms
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 85% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
100% good · 7 samples
▼ 38% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.56 s
86% good · 7 samples
▼ 9% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
661 ms
86% good · 7 samples
▼ 11% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
86%
14% unhappy · 7 rated
14% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 7 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 34 | 2.29 s | 164 ms | 0.04 |
| Desktop | 25 | 1.57 s | 142 ms | 0.01 |
| Tablet | 7 | 1.82 s | 66 ms | 0.02 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 6 | 1.83 | 48.9 s | 43% |
| Poor | 1 | 0.00 | 2.4 s | 34% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 99 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 75 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 499 ms | 941 ms | ▲ 89% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 204 ms | 30 ms | ▼ 85% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 136 ms | 20 ms | ▼ 85% |
| p75 INP | 454 ms | 66 ms | ▼ 85% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 114 ms | 16 ms | ▼ 85% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 998 ms | 552 ms | ▼ 45% |
| p75 CLS | 0.03 | 0.02 | ▼ 38% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 182 ms | 213 ms | ▲ 17% |
| Avg scroll depth | 48% | 42% | ▼ 13% |
| p75 TTFB | 740 ms | 661 ms | ▼ 11% |