Page views
3
24h
▼ 25% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
2.81 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 62% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
101 ms
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 77% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.05
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 57% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.51 s
67% good · 3 samples
▼ 3% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
858 ms
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 2% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
67%
33% unhappy · 3 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 3 | 2.81 s | 101 ms | 0.05 |
| Desktop | 3 | 751 ms | 263 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 2.00 | 67.0 s | 99% |
| Poor | 1 | 1.00 | 15.7 s | 47% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 758 ms | 1.51 s | ▲ 100% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 360 ms | 49 ms | ▼ 86% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 199 ms | 45 ms | ▼ 77% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 133 ms | 30 ms | ▼ 77% |
| p75 INP | 442 ms | 101 ms | ▼ 77% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 110 ms | 25 ms | ▼ 77% |
| p75 LCP | 1.74 s | 2.81 s | ▲ 62% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 990 ms | 392 ms | ▼ 60% |
| p75 CLS | 0.12 | 0.05 | ▼ 57% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 43 ms | 22 ms | ▼ 48% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 42 ms | 25 ms | ▼ 41% |
| p75 HTML download | 149 ms | 179 ms | ▲ 21% |