Page views
3
24h
▼ 77% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.70 s
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 24% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
721 ms
0% good · 1 samples
▲ 304% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.01
100% good · 3 samples
▲ 22% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.18 s
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 36% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
591 ms
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 41% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
67%
33% unhappy · 3 rated
33% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 3 | 1.70 s | 721 ms | 0.01 |
| Desktop | 3 | 461 ms | 105 ms | 0.04 |
| Tablet | 1 | 1.04 s | – | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 3 | 2.00 | 37.5 s | 45% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 INP · Processing | 80 ms | 324 ms | ▲ 304% |
| p75 INP | 178 ms | 721 ms | ▲ 304% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 45 ms | 180 ms | ▲ 304% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 53 ms | 216 ms | ▲ 304% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 411 ms | 49 ms | ▼ 88% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 937 ms | 462 ms | ▼ 51% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 51 ms | 27 ms | ▼ 47% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 420 ms | 595 ms | ▲ 42% |
| p75 TTFB | 1.01 s | 591 ms | ▼ 41% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 865 ms | 521 ms | ▼ 40% |
| p75 FCP | 1.83 s | 1.18 s | ▼ 36% |
| p75 HTML download | 115 ms | 78 ms | ▼ 32% |