Page views
3
24h
▼ 25% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
4.11 s
67% good · 3 samples
▼ 31% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
129 ms
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 71% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 100% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
2.64 s
67% good · 3 samples
▼ 46% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
1.27 s
67% good · 3 samples
▼ 42% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
67%
33% unhappy · 3 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 3 | 4.11 s | 129 ms | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 1 | 3.60 s | 93 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 1.50 | 7.8 s | 26% |
| Poor | 1 | 1.00 | 6.8 s | 11% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 75 ms | 161 ms | ▲ 115% |
| p75 CLS | 0.05 | 0.00 | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · Redirect & other | 111 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 787 ms | 47 ms | ▼ 94% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 73 ms | 141 ms | ▲ 92% |
| p75 INP | 445 ms | 129 ms | ▼ 71% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 111 ms | 32 ms | ▼ 71% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 200 ms | 58 ms | ▼ 71% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 134 ms | 39 ms | ▼ 71% |
| p75 HTML download | 132 ms | 39 ms | ▼ 71% |
| Avg engaged time | 17.9 s | 7.5 s | ▼ 58% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 1.26 s | 547 ms | ▼ 57% |