Page views
1
24h
▼ 90% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.97 s
100% good · 1 samples
▲ 40% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
–
0% good · 0 samples
CLS · p75
0.09
100% good · 1 samples
▲ 751% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.91 s
0% good · 1 samples
▲ 47% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
699 ms
100% good · 1 samples
▲ 3% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
100%
0% unhappy · 1 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 1 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 1 | 1.97 s | – | 0.09 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 1 | 1.00 | 6.5 s | 49% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.01 | 0.09 | ▲ 751% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 327 ms | 917 ms | ▲ 181% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 596 ms | 64 ms | ▼ 89% |
| Avg engaged time | 19.8 s | 6.5 s | ▼ 67% |
| p75 FCP | 1.30 s | 1.91 s | ▲ 47% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 61 ms | 89 ms | ▲ 46% |
| p75 HTML download | 118 ms | 65 ms | ▼ 45% |
| p75 LCP | 1.41 s | 1.97 s | ▲ 40% |
| Avg scroll depth | 69% | 49% | ▼ 29% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 63 ms | 79 ms | ▲ 26% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 396 ms | 292 ms | ▼ 26% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 552 ms | 530 ms | ▼ 4% |