Page views
3
24h
▼ 67% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
5.52 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 273% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
308 ms
0% good · 1 samples
▲ 37% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.05
100% good · 3 samples
▲ 529% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
3.06 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 183% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
1.53 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 156% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
33%
33% unhappy · 3 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 3 | 5.52 s | 308 ms | 0.05 |
| Tablet | 3 | 1.96 s | 161 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 1 | 2.00 s | – | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 2.00 | 63.4 s | 85% |
| Poor | 1 | 0.00 | 15.6 s | 55% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 343 ms | 4.28 s | ▲ 1149% |
| p75 CLS | 0.01 | 0.05 | ▲ 529% |
| p75 LCP | 1.48 s | 5.52 s | ▲ 273% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 465 ms | 1.43 s | ▲ 208% |
| p75 FCP | 1.08 s | 3.06 s | ▲ 183% |
| p75 TTFB | 599 ms | 1.53 s | ▲ 156% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 492 ms | 1.17 s | ▲ 138% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 313 ms | 528 ms | ▲ 69% |
| p75 HTML download | 123 ms | 201 ms | ▲ 63% |
| Avg engaged time | 31.3 s | 47.4 s | ▲ 52% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 68 ms | 92 ms | ▲ 37% |
| p75 INP | 225 ms | 308 ms | ▲ 37% |