Page views
2
24h
▼ 60% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
3.25 s
50% good · 2 samples
▼ 41% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
352 ms
50% good · 2 samples
▼ 29% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 100% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.54 s
50% good · 2 samples
▼ 60% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
1.04 s
50% good · 2 samples
▼ 29% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
0%
50% unhappy · 2 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 2 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 3 | 1.88 s | 126 ms | 0.00 |
| Mobile | 2 | 3.25 s | 352 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 1 | 1.00 | 23.2 s | 27% |
| Poor | 1 | 0.00 | 21.8 s | 23% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 74 ms | 249 ms | ▲ 235% |
| Avg engaged time | 10.9 s | 22.5 s | ▲ 107% |
| p75 CLS | 0.09 | 0.00 | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 164 ms | 14 ms | ▼ 92% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 183 ms | 16 ms | ▼ 91% |
| p75 FCP | 3.82 s | 1.54 s | ▼ 60% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 3.25 s | 1.86 s | ▼ 43% |
| p75 LCP | 5.52 s | 3.25 s | ▼ 41% |
| Avg scroll depth | 40% | 25% | ▼ 38% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 1.48 s | 954 ms | ▼ 35% |
| p75 HTML download | 126 ms | 83 ms | ▼ 34% |
| p75 TTFB | 1.46 s | 1.04 s | ▼ 29% |