Page views
2
24h
▼ 60% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.65 s
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 39% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
270 ms
0% good · 2 samples
▲ 113% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 2 samples
FCP · p75
1.59 s
50% good · 2 samples
▼ 31% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
878 ms
50% good · 2 samples
▼ 39% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
0%
0% unhappy · 2 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 2 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 6 | 1.76 s | 117 ms | 0.06 |
| Mobile | 2 | 1.65 s | 270 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 3.00 | 40.9 s | 34% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg engaged time | 13.7 s | 40.9 s | ▲ 198% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 57 ms | 122 ms | ▲ 113% |
| p75 INP | 127 ms | 270 ms | ▲ 113% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 32 ms | 68 ms | ▲ 113% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 38 ms | 81 ms | ▲ 113% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 3.41 s | 556 ms | ▼ 84% |
| p75 HTML download | 127 ms | 54 ms | ▼ 58% |
| Avg scroll depth | 75% | 34% | ▼ 55% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 595 ms | 317 ms | ▼ 47% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 1.20 s | 723 ms | ▼ 40% |
| p75 LCP | 2.72 s | 1.65 s | ▼ 39% |
| p75 TTFB | 1.45 s | 878 ms | ▼ 39% |