Page views
7
24h
▼ 61% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.47 s
86% good · 7 samples
▲ 16% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
110 ms
100% good · 4 samples
▼ 44% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.10
71% good · 7 samples
± 0% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.45 s
86% good · 7 samples
▲ 17% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
946 ms
57% good · 7 samples
▲ 35% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
57%
14% unhappy · 7 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 7 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 12 | 1.59 s | 715 ms | 0.16 |
| Desktop | 7 | 1.47 s | 110 ms | 0.10 |
| Tablet | 4 | 1.24 s | – | 0.33 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 6 | 2.00 | 38.6 s | 50% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 0.00 | 60.3 s | 88% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 32 ms | 103 ms | ▲ 224% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 22 ms | 69 ms | ▲ 216% |
| Avg engaged time | 22.3 s | 41.7 s | ▲ 87% |
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 30 ms | 45 ms | ▲ 53% |
| p75 INP | 197 ms | 110 ms | ▼ 44% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 49 ms | 27 ms | ▼ 44% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 89 ms | 49 ms | ▼ 44% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 59 ms | 33 ms | ▼ 44% |
| p75 TTFB | 703 ms | 946 ms | ▲ 35% |
| p75 FCP | 1.25 s | 1.45 s | ▲ 17% |
| p75 LCP | 1.26 s | 1.47 s | ▲ 16% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 683 ms | 775 ms | ▲ 13% |