Page views
9
24h
▼ 50% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.37 s
100% good · 9 samples
▲ 13% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
63 ms
100% good · 6 samples
▼ 58% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.14
67% good · 9 samples
▲ 12% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.35 s
89% good · 9 samples
▲ 12% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
736 ms
78% good · 9 samples
▲ 8% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
67%
11% unhappy · 9 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 9 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 11 | 1.48 s | 197 ms | 0.10 |
| Desktop | 9 | 1.37 s | 63 ms | 0.14 |
| Tablet | 7 | 1.49 s | 353 ms | 0.26 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 9 | 2.11 | 30.2 s | 53% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 INP · Presentation | 45 ms | 19 ms | ▼ 58% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 68 ms | 28 ms | ▼ 58% |
| p75 INP | 151 ms | 63 ms | ▼ 58% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 38 ms | 16 ms | ▼ 58% |
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 28 ms | 42 ms | ▲ 49% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 37 ms | 20 ms | ▼ 47% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 58 ms | 38 ms | ▼ 34% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 627 ms | 473 ms | ▼ 25% |
| p75 HTML download | 76 ms | 90 ms | ▲ 18% |
| p75 LCP | 1.21 s | 1.37 s | ▲ 13% |
| p75 FCP | 1.20 s | 1.35 s | ▲ 12% |
| p75 CLS | 0.13 | 0.14 | ▲ 12% |