Page views
62
7d
▼ 36% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.01 s
97% good · 62 samples
▼ 8% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
160 ms
84% good · 38 samples
▼ 4% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.00
90% good · 62 samples
▼ 100% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.00 s
95% good · 62 samples
▼ 7% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
556 ms
90% good · 62 samples
▼ 6% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
77%
3% unhappy · 62 rated
15% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
This element makes the page jump as it loads
div.ad-slot
p75 CLS is 0.20 on the 3 page views where it shifted, mostly on /c/keyboards/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
ul.product-grid
p75 CLS is 0.14 on the 4 page views where it shifted, mostly on /c/keyboards/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
div.related-articles > a
p75 INP is 307 ms over 4 page views, mostly on /c/keyboards/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.01 s, INP 160 ms, CLS 0.00: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Based on 62 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 107 | 1.67 s | 336 ms | 0.05 |
| Desktop | 62 | 1.01 s | 160 ms | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 26 | 1.35 s | 176 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 60 | 1.48 | 36.4 s | 61% |
| Needs improvement | 2 | 0.50 | 46.1 s | 28% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.12 | 0.00 | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 14 ms | 25 ms | ▲ 76% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 57 ms | 40 ms | ▼ 30% |
| p75 HTML download | 78 ms | 92 ms | ▲ 19% |
| Avg scroll depth | 52% | 60% | ▲ 15% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 555 ms | 473 ms | ▼ 15% |
| Avg engaged time | 40.5 s | 36.7 s | ▼ 9% |
| p75 LCP | 1.10 s | 1.01 s | ▼ 8% |
| p75 FCP | 1.08 s | 1.00 s | ▼ 7% |
| p75 TTFB | 591 ms | 556 ms | ▼ 6% |