Page views
1
24h
▼ 86% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
2.00 s
100% good · 1 samples
▲ 96% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
–
0% good · 0 samples
CLS · p75
0.06
100% good · 1 samples
▲ 1563% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.97 s
0% good · 1 samples
▲ 98% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
1.05 s
0% good · 1 samples
▲ 127% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
100%
0% unhappy · 1 rated
100% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 1 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 1 | 727 ms | – | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 1 | 1.69 s | – | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 1 | 2.00 s | – | 0.06 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 1 | 0.00 | 34.7 s | 100% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.00 | 0.06 | ▲ 1563% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 379 ms | 1.05 s | ▲ 176% |
| p75 TTFB | 460 ms | 1.05 s | ▲ 127% |
| p75 HTML download | 118 ms | 254 ms | ▲ 115% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 37 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 47 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 FCP | 993 ms | 1.97 s | ▲ 98% |
| p75 LCP | 1.02 s | 2.00 s | ▲ 96% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 564 ms | 951 ms | ▲ 68% |
| Avg scroll depth | 61% | 100% | ▲ 64% |
| Avg engaged time | 24.6 s | 34.7 s | ▲ 41% |