Page views
38
7d
▲ 36% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.53 s
84% good · 38 samples
▼ 21% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
89 ms
93% good · 29 samples
▼ 5% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
97% good · 38 samples
▼ 59% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.25 s
92% good · 38 samples
▼ 21% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
741 ms
79% good · 38 samples
▼ 6% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
76%
8% unhappy · 38 rated
What to fix first
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.53 s, INP 89 ms, CLS 0.02: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Based on 38 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 45 | 2.28 s | 286 ms | 0.01 |
| Desktop | 38 | 1.53 s | 89 ms | 0.02 |
| Tablet | 15 | 2.00 s | 223 ms | 0.02 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 32 | 1.91 | 32.5 s | 63% |
| Needs improvement | 5 | 1.00 | 28.5 s | 54% |
| Poor | 1 | 0.00 | 1.9 s | 16% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.05 | 0.02 | ▼ 59% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 984 ms | 513 ms | ▼ 48% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 197 ms | 268 ms | ▲ 36% |
| p75 LCP | 1.94 s | 1.53 s | ▼ 21% |
| p75 FCP | 1.57 s | 1.25 s | ▼ 21% |
| p75 HTML download | 110 ms | 90 ms | ▼ 17% |
| Avg engaged time | 36.8 s | 31.2 s | ▼ 15% |
| Avg scroll depth | 56% | 61% | ▲ 9% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 670 ms | 619 ms | ▼ 8% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 653 ms | 695 ms | ▲ 6% |
| p75 TTFB | 786 ms | 741 ms | ▼ 6% |