Page views
3
24h
▼ 62% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
2.50 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 36% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
174 ms
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 62% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 100% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.57 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 59% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
815 ms
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 43% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
33%
0% unhappy · 3 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 5 | 2.12 s | 268 ms | 0.08 |
| Desktop | 3 | 2.50 s | 174 ms | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 2 | 1.53 s | 529 ms | 0.11 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 2.50 | 30.3 s | 56% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 2.00 | 3.6 s | 31% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 342 ms | 1.40 s | ▲ 309% |
| p75 CLS | 0.02 | 0.00 | ▼ 100% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 448 ms | 147 ms | ▼ 67% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 48 ms | 78 ms | ▲ 62% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 32 ms | 52 ms | ▲ 62% |
| p75 INP | 107 ms | 174 ms | ▲ 62% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 27 ms | 44 ms | ▲ 62% |
| p75 FCP | 994 ms | 1.57 s | ▲ 59% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 1.29 s | 733 ms | ▼ 43% |
| p75 TTFB | 570 ms | 815 ms | ▲ 43% |
| Avg engaged time | 33.6 s | 21.4 s | ▼ 36% |
| p75 LCP | 1.84 s | 2.50 s | ▲ 36% |