Page views
4
24h
▲ 33% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.31 s
100% good · 4 samples
▼ 15% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
136 ms
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 17% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.01
100% good · 4 samples
▼ 88% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
779 ms
100% good · 4 samples
▼ 47% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
287 ms
100% good · 4 samples
▼ 59% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
100%
0% unhappy · 4 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 4 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 4 | 1.31 s | 136 ms | 0.01 |
| Mobile | 3 | 2.87 s | 99 ms | 0.04 |
| Tablet | 2 | 954 ms | 131 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 4 | 1.75 | 26.3 s | 56% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.05 | 0.01 | ▼ 88% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 283 ms | 95 ms | ▼ 66% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 705 ms | 252 ms | ▼ 64% |
| p75 TTFB | 705 ms | 287 ms | ▼ 59% |
| p75 FCP | 1.46 s | 779 ms | ▼ 47% |
| p75 INP | 164 ms | 136 ms | ▼ 17% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 74 ms | 61 ms | ▼ 17% |
| p75 LCP | 1.54 s | 1.31 s | ▼ 15% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 477 ms | 544 ms | ▲ 14% |
| p75 HTML download | 88 ms | 101 ms | ▲ 14% |
| Avg scroll depth | 64% | 56% | ▼ 13% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 417 ms | 455 ms | ▲ 9% |