Page views
13
7d
± 0% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.21 s
85% good · 13 samples
▼ 24% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
148 ms
75% good · 8 samples
▲ 13% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
92% good · 13 samples
▼ 81% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
954 ms
85% good · 13 samples
▼ 16% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
513 ms
85% good · 13 samples
▼ 15% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
62%
15% unhappy · 13 rated
What to fix first
This element makes the page jump as it loads
header.site-header
p75 CLS is 0.17 on the 3 page views where it shifted, mostly on /articles/34/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
Based on 13 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 21 | 4.69 s | 188 ms | 0.02 |
| Desktop | 13 | 1.21 s | 148 ms | 0.02 |
| Tablet | 4 | 4.80 s | 122 ms | 0.08 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 11 | 2.27 | 38.2 s | 53% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 0.00 | 3.4 s | 100% |
| Poor | 1 | 0.00 | 55.7 s | 49% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.10 | 0.02 | ▼ 81% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 673 ms | 372 ms | ▼ 45% |
| Avg engaged time | 26.1 s | 36.8 s | ▲ 41% |
| p75 LCP | 1.60 s | 1.21 s | ▼ 24% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 315 ms | 374 ms | ▲ 19% |
| p75 FCP | 1.14 s | 954 ms | ▼ 16% |
| p75 TTFB | 601 ms | 513 ms | ▼ 15% |
| p75 INP | 131 ms | 148 ms | ▲ 13% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 514 ms | 464 ms | ▼ 10% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 738 ms | 694 ms | ▼ 6% |