Page views
2
24h
▼ 33% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.15 s
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 64% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
113 ms
100% good · 1 samples
▲ 6% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 100% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
865 ms
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 63% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
324 ms
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 80% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
100%
0% unhappy · 2 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 2 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 5 | 1.61 s | 293 ms | 0.01 |
| Desktop | 2 | 1.15 s | 113 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 2.00 | 35.7 s | 37% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 199 ms | 413 ms | ▲ 108% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 23 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 37 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 1.65 s | 216 ms | ▼ 87% |
| p75 TTFB | 1.62 s | 324 ms | ▼ 80% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 1.59 s | 324 ms | ▼ 80% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 532 ms | 942 ms | ▲ 77% |
| p75 LCP | 3.20 s | 1.15 s | ▼ 64% |
| p75 FCP | 2.37 s | 865 ms | ▼ 63% |
| p75 HTML download | 113 ms | 54 ms | ▼ 52% |
| Avg engaged time | 44.6 s | 35.7 s | ▼ 20% |