Page views
19
7d
▲ 58% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.28 s
95% good · 19 samples
▲ 25% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
104 ms
92% good · 13 samples
▼ 29% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.10
84% good · 19 samples
▼ 9% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.01 s
95% good · 19 samples
▲ 15% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
592 ms
95% good · 19 samples
▲ 16% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
79%
16% unhappy · 19 rated
11% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
div.related-articles > a
p75 INP is 350 ms over 3 page views, mostly on /articles/26/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
div.ad-slot
p75 CLS is 0.23 on the 3 page views where it shifted, mostly on /articles/26/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
#onetrust-banner-sdk
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 4 page views where it shifted, mostly on /articles/26/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
Based on 19 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 19 | 1.28 s | 104 ms | 0.10 |
| Mobile | 14 | 2.63 s | 412 ms | 0.05 |
| Tablet | 5 | 1.98 s | 177 ms | 0.17 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 18 | 1.39 | 36.4 s | 49% |
| Poor | 1 | 0.00 | 34.4 s | 28% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg engaged time | 26.3 s | 36.3 s | ▲ 38% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 40 ms | 52 ms | ▲ 30% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 66 ms | 47 ms | ▼ 29% |
| p75 INP | 148 ms | 104 ms | ▼ 29% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 37 ms | 26 ms | ▼ 29% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 44 ms | 31 ms | ▼ 29% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 314 ms | 404 ms | ▲ 29% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 282 ms | 357 ms | ▲ 27% |
| p75 LCP | 1.02 s | 1.28 s | ▲ 25% |
| p75 TTFB | 510 ms | 592 ms | ▲ 16% |
| p75 FCP | 873 ms | 1.01 s | ▲ 15% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 219 ms | 252 ms | ▲ 15% |