Page views
1
24h
▼ 83% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.16 s
100% good · 1 samples
▼ 23% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
21 ms
100% good · 1 samples
▼ 81% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 1 samples
FCP · p75
1.05 s
100% good · 1 samples
▼ 18% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
504 ms
100% good · 1 samples
▼ 38% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
100%
0% unhappy · 1 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 1 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 1 | 1.16 s | 21 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 1 | 0.00 | 253.6 s | 38% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 7 ms | 62 ms | ▲ 753% |
| Avg engaged time | 34.1 s | 253.6 s | ▲ 643% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 6 ms | 44 ms | ▲ 591% |
| p75 INP | 115 ms | 21 ms | ▼ 81% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 29 ms | 5 ms | ▼ 81% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 35 ms | 6 ms | ▼ 81% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 52 ms | 10 ms | ▼ 81% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 103 ms | 27 ms | ▼ 74% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 782 ms | 399 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 399 ms | 210 ms | ▼ 47% |
| p75 HTML download | 82 ms | 44 ms | ▼ 47% |
| Avg scroll depth | 66% | 38% | ▼ 42% |