Page views
3
24h
▼ 80% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.13 s
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 24% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
–
0% good · 0 samples
CLS · p75
0.19
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 347% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.30 s
67% good · 3 samples
▼ 14% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
513 ms
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 32% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
67%
33% unhappy · 3 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 6 | 2.92 s | 193 ms | 0.12 |
| Desktop | 3 | 1.13 s | – | 0.19 |
| Tablet | 1 | 1.96 s | – | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 3 | 1.00 | 58.7 s | 63% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.04 | 0.19 | ▲ 347% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 71 ms | 232 ms | ▲ 229% |
| Avg engaged time | 29.3 s | 58.7 s | ▲ 101% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 40 ms | 66 ms | ▲ 66% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 27 ms | 42 ms | ▲ 56% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 481 ms | 235 ms | ▼ 51% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 674 ms | 405 ms | ▼ 40% |
| p75 TTFB | 752 ms | 513 ms | ▼ 32% |
| p75 LCP | 1.49 s | 1.13 s | ▼ 24% |
| Avg scroll depth | 51% | 63% | ▲ 24% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 552 ms | 635 ms | ▲ 15% |
| p75 FCP | 1.50 s | 1.30 s | ▼ 14% |