Page views
1
24h
▼ 67% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
2.79 s
0% good · 1 samples
▲ 231% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
146 ms
100% good · 1 samples
▲ 61% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 1 samples
▼ 100% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.24 s
100% good · 1 samples
▲ 78% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
675 ms
100% good · 1 samples
▲ 73% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
0%
0% unhappy · 1 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 1 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 1 | 334 ms | 146 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 1 | 2.79 s | 146 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Needs improvement | 1 | 1.00 | 2.0 s | 13% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load time | 294 ms | 1.44 s | ▲ 390% |
| p75 LCP | 842 ms | 2.79 s | ▲ 231% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 235 ms | 629 ms | ▲ 168% |
| Avg engaged time | 18.7 s | 2.0 s | ▼ 90% |
| p75 FCP | 698 ms | 1.24 s | ▲ 78% |
| Avg scroll depth | 53% | 13% | ▼ 75% |
| p75 TTFB | 389 ms | 675 ms | ▲ 73% |
| p75 HTML download | 92 ms | 25 ms | ▼ 72% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 41 ms | 66 ms | ▲ 61% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 27 ms | 44 ms | ▲ 61% |
| p75 INP | 91 ms | 146 ms | ▲ 61% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 23 ms | 37 ms | ▲ 61% |