Page views
562
24h
▼ 21% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.49 s
88% good · 562 samples
▼ 2% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
136 ms
86% good · 371 samples
▼ 11% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.03
89% good · 562 samples
▼ 16% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.26 s
88% good · 562 samples
▼ 4% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
716 ms
80% good · 562 samples
▲ 3% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
72%
6% unhappy · 562 rated
10% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Slow page loads cost you engagement
Comparing like with like (the same page type), page views whose main content took over 4 s got 51% less engaged time and 80% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s. Based on 17 slow page views across 3 page types.
Compare fast and slow page views →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
ul.product-grid
p75 CLS is 0.14 on the 56 page views where it shifted, mostly on /.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
#onetrust-banner-sdk
p75 CLS is 0.10 on the 49 page views where it shifted, mostly on /.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
nav.toc > a.toc-link
p75 INP is 230 ms over 40 page views, mostly on /articles/165/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.49 s, INP 136 ms, CLS 0.03: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 726 | 2.23 s | 271 ms | 0.03 |
| Desktop | 562 | 1.49 s | 136 ms | 0.03 |
| Tablet | 170 | 2.25 s | 258 ms | 0.03 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 497 | 1.73 | 35.8 s | 58% |
| Needs improvement | 46 | 0.78 | 25.8 s | 53% |
| Poor | 19 | 0.37 | 19.2 s | 38% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 INP | 154 ms | 136 ms | ▼ 11% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 544 ms | 484 ms | ▼ 11% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 393 ms | 427 ms | ▲ 9% |
| p75 FCP | 1.31 s | 1.26 s | ▼ 4% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 402 ms | 415 ms | ▲ 3% |
| p75 TTFB | 696 ms | 716 ms | ▲ 3% |
| p75 LCP | 1.53 s | 1.49 s | ▼ 2% |