Page views
23
24h
▼ 66% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.27 s
100% good · 23 samples
▼ 45% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
72 ms
100% good · 14 samples
▼ 35% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.02
91% good · 23 samples
▼ 49% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.25 s
91% good · 23 samples
▼ 46% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
686 ms
78% good · 23 samples
▼ 41% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
91%
0% unhappy · 23 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 23 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 35 | 2.64 s | 422 ms | 0.07 |
| Desktop | 23 | 1.27 s | 72 ms | 0.02 |
| Tablet | 2 | 3.67 s | 373 ms | 0.05 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 23 | 1.78 | 32.3 s | 56% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.05 | 0.02 | ▼ 49% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 1.19 s | 618 ms | ▼ 48% |
| p75 FCP | 2.31 s | 1.25 s | ▼ 46% |
| p75 LCP | 2.32 s | 1.27 s | ▼ 45% |
| p75 TTFB | 1.16 s | 686 ms | ▼ 41% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 999 ms | 618 ms | ▼ 38% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 33 ms | 22 ms | ▼ 35% |
| p75 INP | 111 ms | 72 ms | ▼ 35% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 50 ms | 32 ms | ▼ 35% |
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 34 ms | 22 ms | ▼ 34% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 55 ms | 41 ms | ▼ 27% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 43 ms | 32 ms | ▼ 26% |