Page views
3
7d
▲ 50% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
2.17 s
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 16% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
442 ms
0% good · 2 samples
▲ 196% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.01
100% good · 3 samples
FCP · p75
769 ms
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 70% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
407 ms
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 63% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
33%
0% unhappy · 3 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tablet | 3 | 2.17 s | 442 ms | 0.01 |
| Desktop | 3 | 875 ms | 46 ms | 0.06 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 3 | 1.33 | 41.1 s | 38% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load time | 110 ms | 1.33 s | ▲ 1109% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 37 ms | 171 ms | ▲ 364% |
| Avg engaged time | 13.6 s | 41.1 s | ▲ 202% |
| p75 INP | 150 ms | 442 ms | ▲ 196% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 37 ms | 111 ms | ▲ 196% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 45 ms | 133 ms | ▲ 196% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 67 ms | 199 ms | ▲ 196% |
| Avg scroll depth | 19% | 38% | ▲ 102% |
| p75 HTML download | 47 ms | 80 ms | ▲ 72% |
| p75 FCP | 2.60 s | 769 ms | ▼ 70% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 867 ms | 305 ms | ▼ 65% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 151 ms | 54 ms | ▼ 64% |