Page views
11
7d
▼ 27% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
981 ms
100% good · 11 samples
▼ 35% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
106 ms
83% good · 6 samples
▼ 29% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.12
73% good · 11 samples
▲ 59% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
952 ms
100% good · 11 samples
▼ 36% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
514 ms
91% good · 11 samples
▼ 43% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
64%
9% unhappy · 11 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 11 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 7 | 927 ms | 70 ms | 0.12 |
| Mobile | 4 | 1.11 s | 314 ms | 0.05 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 11 | 2.18 | 20.1 s | 63% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 89 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 CLS | 0.07 | 0.12 | ▲ 59% |
| p75 TTFB | 898 ms | 514 ms | ▼ 43% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 653 ms | 390 ms | ▼ 40% |
| Avg engaged time | 31.9 s | 20.1 s | ▼ 37% |
| p75 FCP | 1.49 s | 952 ms | ▼ 36% |
| p75 LCP | 1.50 s | 981 ms | ▼ 35% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 92 ms | 64 ms | ▼ 30% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 90 ms | 63 ms | ▼ 30% |
| p75 INP | 150 ms | 106 ms | ▼ 29% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 37 ms | 26 ms | ▼ 29% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 67 ms | 48 ms | ▼ 29% |