Page views
2
7d
LCP · p75
1.21 s
100% good · 2 samples
INP · p75
251 ms
50% good · 2 samples
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 2 samples
FCP · p75
1.19 s
100% good · 2 samples
TTFB · p75
648 ms
100% good · 2 samples
Happy page views
50%
0% unhappy · 2 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 2 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tablet | 2 | 1.21 s | 251 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 1 | 1.22 s | – | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 0.00 | 10.2 s | 66% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| No page views in the previous 7d to compare against yet. | |||