Page views
1
24h
LCP · p75
3.86 s
0% good · 1 samples
INP · p75
33 ms
100% good · 1 samples
CLS · p75
0.30
0% good · 1 samples
FCP · p75
1.33 s
100% good · 1 samples
TTFB · p75
20 ms
100% good · 1 samples
Happy page views
0%
100% unhappy · 1 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 1 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tablet | 1 | 3.86 s | 33 ms | 0.30 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Needs improvement | 1 | 1.00 | 3.2 s | 100% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| No page views in the previous 24h to compare against yet. | |||