Page views
16
7d
▼ 11% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.17 s
94% good · 16 samples
▼ 33% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
194 ms
75% good · 12 samples
▲ 9% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.01
100% good · 16 samples
▼ 86% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.00 s
88% good · 16 samples
▼ 13% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
539 ms
88% good · 16 samples
▼ 24% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
75%
0% unhappy · 16 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 16 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 10 | 946 ms | 174 ms | 0.00 |
| Mobile | 6 | 1.97 s | 189 ms | 0.01 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 15 | 1.93 | 34.8 s | 60% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 0.00 | 5.1 s | 46% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.05 | 0.01 | ▼ 86% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 997 ms | 414 ms | ▼ 58% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 53 ms | 24 ms | ▼ 55% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 732 ms | 335 ms | ▼ 54% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 52 ms | 32 ms | ▼ 37% |
| Avg scroll depth | 43% | 59% | ▲ 37% |
| Avg engaged time | 51.5 s | 33.0 s | ▼ 36% |
| p75 LCP | 1.74 s | 1.17 s | ▼ 33% |
| p75 TTFB | 712 ms | 539 ms | ▼ 24% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 591 ms | 468 ms | ▼ 21% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 364 ms | 298 ms | ▼ 18% |
| p75 FCP | 1.16 s | 1.00 s | ▼ 13% |