Page views
2
7d
▼ 60% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.33 s
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 15% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
53 ms
100% good · 1 samples
▼ 49% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.01
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 78% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
865 ms
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 22% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
465 ms
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 17% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
100%
0% unhappy · 2 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 2 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 11 | 1.57 s | 76 ms | 0.02 |
| Mobile | 7 | 2.42 s | 144 ms | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 2 | 1.33 s | 53 ms | 0.01 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 2.00 | 43.7 s | 27% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg engaged time | 21.9 s | 43.7 s | ▲ 99% |
| p75 CLS | 0.05 | 0.01 | ▼ 78% |
| p75 HTML download | 92 ms | 40 ms | ▼ 56% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 74 ms | 33 ms | ▼ 55% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 31 ms | 16 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 INP | 103 ms | 53 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 26 ms | 13 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 46 ms | 24 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 39 ms | 20 ms | ▼ 48% |
| Avg scroll depth | 51% | 26% | ▼ 48% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 955 ms | 577 ms | ▼ 40% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 469 ms | 315 ms | ▼ 33% |