Page views
219
7d
± 0% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.92 s
84% good · 219 samples
▲ 2% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
199 ms
75% good · 148 samples
▼ 18% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
92% good · 219 samples
▲ 30% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.50 s
84% good · 219 samples
▼ 2% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
773 ms
76% good · 219 samples
▼ 11% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
67%
9% unhappy · 219 rated
16% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Slow page loads cost you engagement
Comparing like with like (the same page type), page views whose main content took over 4 s got 54% less engaged time and 61% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s. Based on 16 slow page views across 1 page type.
Compare fast and slow page views →
CLS got 30% worse than the previous 7d
p75 CLS is now 0.04. The Vitals tab shows when it changed and which pages it changed on.
CLS over time →
Tablet visitors get a much slower INP
p75 INP is 236 ms on tablet against 155 ms on desktop. Tablet is 13% of your page views.
Try: Test on a real mid-range phone or with CPU throttling: big images, heavy JavaScript and third-party scripts cost far more there.
INP by device →
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
div.gallery > button.next
p75 INP is 236 ms over 21 page views, mostly on /. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
div.related-articles > a
p75 INP is 205 ms over 22 page views, mostly on /. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
button.menu-toggle
p75 INP is 227 ms over 15 page views, mostly on /. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
1 more finding
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.92 s, INP 199 ms, CLS 0.04: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Based on 219 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 109 | 2.26 s | 226 ms | 0.03 |
| Desktop | 82 | 1.57 s | 155 ms | 0.05 |
| Tablet | 28 | 2.33 s | 236 ms | 0.01 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 185 | 1.59 | 32.8 s | 57% |
| Needs improvement | 18 | 0.94 | 29.2 s | 54% |
| Poor | 16 | 0.63 | 15.2 s | 38% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 56 ms | 71 ms | ▲ 27% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 51 ms | 64 ms | ▲ 26% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 352 ms | 262 ms | ▼ 25% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 698 ms | 572 ms | ▼ 18% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 73 ms | 60 ms | ▼ 18% |
| p75 INP | 243 ms | 199 ms | ▼ 18% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 61 ms | 50 ms | ▼ 18% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 109 ms | 90 ms | ▼ 18% |
| p75 TTFB | 867 ms | 773 ms | ▼ 11% |
| Avg engaged time | 29.2 s | 31.2 s | ▲ 7% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 697 ms | 649 ms | ▼ 7% |
| Avg scroll depth | 53% | 55% | ▲ 4% |