Page views
810
7d
▼ 11% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.59 s
89% good · 810 samples
± 0% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
146 ms
84% good · 525 samples
▲ 1% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
88% good · 810 samples
▲ 22% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.30 s
88% good · 810 samples
▲ 1% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
721 ms
79% good · 810 samples
▲ 3% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
73%
5% unhappy · 810 rated
10% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Slow page loads cost you engagement
Comparing like with like (the same page type), page views whose main content took over 4 s got 71% less engaged time and 70% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s. Based on 18 slow page views across 3 page types.
Compare fast and slow page views →
CLS got 22% worse than the previous 7d
p75 CLS is now 0.04. The Vitals tab shows when it changed and which pages it changed on.
CLS over time →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
div.ad-slot
p75 CLS is 0.12 on the 88 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
header.site-header
p75 CLS is 0.12 on the 78 page views where it shifted, mostly on /c/pc-builds/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
#onetrust-banner-sdk
p75 CLS is 0.10 on the 83 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/. 1 more element that shifts is in the Vitals tab.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
button.add-to-cart
p75 INP is 212 ms over 64 page views, mostly on /c/pc-builds/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
1 more finding
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.59 s, INP 146 ms, CLS 0.04: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 1.0k | 2.15 s | 253 ms | 0.03 |
| Desktop | 810 | 1.59 s | 146 ms | 0.04 |
| Tablet | 234 | 2.25 s | 247 ms | 0.04 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 719 | 1.70 | 37.4 s | 58% |
| Needs improvement | 70 | 1.01 | 24.6 s | 57% |
| Poor | 21 | 0.48 | 12.9 s | 39% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg engaged time | 32.2 s | 35.6 s | ▲ 11% |
| Avg scroll depth | 54% | 57% | ▲ 6% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 550 ms | 526 ms | ▼ 4% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 584 ms | 601 ms | ▲ 3% |
| p75 TTFB | 703 ms | 721 ms | ▲ 3% |