Page views
72
24h
▼ 49% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.55 s
92% good · 72 samples
▼ 12% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
183 ms
81% good · 43 samples
▲ 18% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.03
90% good · 72 samples
▲ 1% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.20 s
86% good · 72 samples
▼ 19% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
657 ms
83% good · 72 samples
▼ 23% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
74%
7% unhappy · 72 rated
What to fix first
INP got 18% worse than the previous 24h
p75 INP is now 183 ms. The Vitals tab shows when it changed and which pages it changed on.
INP over time →
Key presses in this element respond slowly
#search_input
p75 INP is 212 ms over 9 page views, mostly on /. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
div.ad-slot
p75 CLS is 0.22 on the 7 page views where it shifted, mostly on /articles/0/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
button.add-to-cart
p75 INP is 250 ms over 6 page views, mostly on /articles/0/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.55 s, INP 183 ms, CLS 0.03: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Based on 72 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 90 | 1.90 s | 332 ms | 0.05 |
| Desktop | 72 | 1.55 s | 183 ms | 0.03 |
| Tablet | 14 | 2.76 s | 373 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 66 | 1.67 | 37.1 s | 53% |
| Needs improvement | 3 | 0.67 | 26.3 s | 46% |
| Poor | 3 | 0.00 | 17.6 s | 51% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 498 ms | 323 ms | ▼ 35% |
| Avg engaged time | 28.9 s | 35.8 s | ▲ 24% |
| p75 TTFB | 858 ms | 657 ms | ▼ 23% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 701 ms | 568 ms | ▼ 19% |
| p75 FCP | 1.48 s | 1.20 s | ▼ 19% |
| p75 INP | 154 ms | 183 ms | ▲ 18% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 69 ms | 82 ms | ▲ 18% |
| p75 HTML download | 94 ms | 83 ms | ▼ 12% |
| p75 LCP | 1.75 s | 1.55 s | ▼ 12% |
| Avg scroll depth | 57% | 52% | ▼ 9% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 601 ms | 631 ms | ▲ 5% |