Page views
3
24h
▲ 50% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
4.76 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 136% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
24 ms
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 73% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 3 samples
FCP · p75
2.96 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 40% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
1.93 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 93% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
67%
33% unhappy · 3 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 1 | 1.10 s | 30 ms | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 1 | 8.42 s | 3 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 1 | 871 ms | – | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 2.00 | 31.1 s | 34% |
| Poor | 1 | 1.00 | 4.8 s | 32% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 37 ms | 219 ms | ▲ 501% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 336 ms | 1.35 s | ▲ 301% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 646 ms | 2.57 s | ▲ 298% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 788 ms | 1.91 s | ▲ 143% |
| p75 LCP | 2.02 s | 4.76 s | ▲ 136% |
| p75 TTFB | 1.00 s | 1.93 s | ▲ 93% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 100 ms | 14 ms | ▼ 86% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 114 ms | 21 ms | ▼ 81% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 39 ms | 11 ms | ▼ 73% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 26 ms | 7 ms | ▼ 73% |
| p75 INP | 87 ms | 24 ms | ▼ 73% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 22 ms | 6 ms | ▼ 73% |