Page views
4
7d
± 0% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
2.34 s
75% good · 4 samples
▼ 54% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
398 ms
50% good · 2 samples
▼ 36% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.03
75% good · 4 samples
▲ 882% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.22 s
75% good · 4 samples
▼ 66% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
713 ms
75% good · 4 samples
▼ 65% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
50%
25% unhappy · 4 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 4 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tablet | 3 | 1.31 s | 398 ms | 0.06 |
| Mobile | 1 | 4.34 s | – | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 3 | 1.33 | 22.8 s | 45% |
| Poor | 1 | 1.00 | 20.8 s | 28% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.00 | 0.03 | ▲ 882% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 9 ms | 58 ms | ▲ 549% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 10 ms | 62 ms | ▲ 522% |
| p75 TTFB · Redirect & other | 18 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 4.06 s | 1.02 s | ▼ 75% |
| p75 FCP | 3.59 s | 1.22 s | ▼ 66% |
| p75 TTFB | 2.01 s | 713 ms | ▼ 65% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 2.01 s | 713 ms | ▼ 65% |
| p75 HTML download | 322 ms | 115 ms | ▼ 64% |
| p75 LCP | 5.13 s | 2.34 s | ▼ 54% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 587 ms | 309 ms | ▼ 47% |
| Avg scroll depth | 70% | 41% | ▼ 42% |