Page views
2
7d
▼ 33% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
2.32 s
50% good · 2 samples
▲ 5% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
166 ms
100% good · 1 samples
▼ 27% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.15
50% good · 2 samples
▲ 455% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
2.29 s
50% good · 2 samples
▲ 55% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
1.52 s
50% good · 2 samples
▲ 77% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
50%
0% unhappy · 2 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 2 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 2 | 2.32 s | 166 ms | 0.15 |
| Tablet | 1 | 1.55 s | – | 0.01 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 1 | 4.00 | 0.1 s | 83% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 2.00 | 63.4 s | 100% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.03 | 0.15 | ▲ 455% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 299 ms | 803 ms | ▲ 168% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 574 ms | 1.37 s | ▲ 138% |
| p75 HTML download | 81 ms | 183 ms | ▲ 125% |
| Avg scroll depth | 48% | 92% | ▲ 91% |
| p75 TTFB | 857 ms | 1.52 s | ▲ 77% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 114 ms | 46 ms | ▼ 59% |
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 61 ms | 95 ms | ▲ 57% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 90 ms | 39 ms | ▼ 57% |
| p75 FCP | 1.47 s | 2.29 s | ▲ 55% |
| Avg engaged time | 23.8 s | 31.7 s | ▲ 33% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 69 ms | 50 ms | ▼ 27% |