Page views
659
7d
▼ 9% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.50 s
91% good · 659 samples
▼ 4% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
156 ms
84% good · 438 samples
▲ 15% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.03
90% good · 659 samples
▼ 15% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.29 s
88% good · 659 samples
▲ 2% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
705 ms
81% good · 659 samples
▲ 4% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
75%
6% unhappy · 659 rated
What to fix first
Slow page loads cost you engagement
Comparing like with like (the same page type), page views whose main content took over 4 s got 62% less engaged time and 67% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s. Based on 20 slow page views across 3 page types.
Compare fast and slow page views →
INP got 15% worse than the previous 7d
p75 INP is now 156 ms. The Vitals tab shows when it changed and which pages it changed on.
INP over time →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
#onetrust-banner-sdk
p75 CLS is 0.12 on the 72 page views where it shifted, mostly on /.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
header.site-header
p75 CLS is 0.12 on the 68 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
button.add-to-cart
p75 INP is 223 ms over 44 page views, mostly on /search/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.50 s, INP 156 ms, CLS 0.03: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 659 | 1.50 s | 156 ms | 0.03 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 600 | 1.77 | 35.2 s | 58% |
| Needs improvement | 36 | 1.03 | 22.9 s | 51% |
| Poor | 23 | 0.57 | 13.5 s | 40% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 INP | 135 ms | 156 ms | ▲ 15% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 399 ms | 362 ms | ▼ 9% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 546 ms | 585 ms | ▲ 7% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 566 ms | 532 ms | ▼ 6% |
| Avg scroll depth | 55% | 57% | ▲ 4% |
| p75 LCP | 1.56 s | 1.50 s | ▼ 4% |
| p75 TTFB | 678 ms | 705 ms | ▲ 4% |