ClickVitals /Shop & magazine (demo) Log in Sign up
Clear filters
Page views
40
7d
▲ 74% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.41 s
88% good · 40 samples
▼ 41% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
102 ms
83% good · 24 samples
▲ 1% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.01
95% good · 40 samples
▼ 83% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.31 s
90% good · 40 samples
▼ 10% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
739 ms
75% good · 40 samples
▼ 10% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
73%
8% unhappy · 40 rated

10% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.

What to fix first

Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
div.gallery > button.next
p75 INP is 286 ms over 5 page views, mostly on /articles/0/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
Key presses in this element respond slowly
#search_input
p75 INP is 248 ms over 4 page views, mostly on /articles/0/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.41 s, INP 102 ms, CLS 0.01: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →

Based on 40 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).

Trend

By device

DevicePage viewsp75 LCPp75 INPp75 CLS
Desktop40 1.41 s 102 ms 0.01

Does speed cost engagement?

Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.

LCPPage viewsClicks per viewEngaged timeAvg scroll
Good351.74 40.0 s57%
Needs improvement31.00 14.6 s67%
Poor21.00 18.0 s34%

Biggest changes vs previous 7d

MeasurePreviousNowChange
p75 CLS0.070.01 ▼ 83%
p75 LCP · Render delay359 ms72 ms ▼ 80%
p75 LCP · Load delay1.08 s406 ms ▼ 63%
p75 LCP · Load time677 ms352 ms ▼ 48%
p75 LCP2.38 s1.41 s ▼ 41%
p75 TTFB · TLS74 ms63 ms ▼ 15%
p75 TTFB · Server wait598 ms668 ms ▲ 12%
p75 FCP1.47 s1.31 s ▼ 10%
p75 TTFB818 ms739 ms ▼ 10%
Avg engaged time38.8 s37.0 s ▼ 5%