ClickVitals /Shop & magazine (demo) Log in Sign up
Clear filters
Page views
647
7d
▼ 15% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.59 s
89% good · 647 samples
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
147 ms
88% good · 428 samples
▲ 4% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
89% good · 647 samples
▲ 30% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.35 s
87% good · 647 samples
▲ 2% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
718 ms
79% good · 647 samples
▲ 1% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
74%
7% unhappy · 647 rated

What to fix first

Slow page loads cost you engagement
Comparing like with like (the same page type), page views whose main content took over 4 s got 46% less engaged time and 83% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s. Based on 33 slow page views across 5 page types.
Compare fast and slow page views →
CLS got 30% worse than the previous 7d
p75 CLS is now 0.04. The Vitals tab shows when it changed and which pages it changed on.
CLS over time →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
ul.product-grid
p75 CLS is 0.12 on the 69 page views where it shifted, mostly on /.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
header.site-header
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 68 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.59 s, INP 147 ms, CLS 0.04: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →

Trend

By device

DevicePage viewsp75 LCPp75 INPp75 CLS
Desktop647 1.59 s 147 ms 0.04

Does speed cost engagement?

Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.

LCPPage viewsClicks per viewEngaged timeAvg scroll
Good5731.62 33.6 s57%
Needs improvement410.83 21.0 s55%
Poor330.27 17.9 s39%

Biggest changes vs previous 7d

MeasurePreviousNowChange
p75 LCP · Render delay370 ms407 ms ▲ 10%
p75 LCP · Load time583 ms537 ms ▼ 8%
p75 LCP · Load delay398 ms424 ms ▲ 7%
Avg engaged time33.2 s32.0 s ▼ 4%
p75 TTFB · Server wait591 ms609 ms ▲ 3%